W13: April 9 – FTF/Sync

• Final Paper Sign up
• Mid-term Feedback and Adjustments

Educational Psychology & Educational Technology:
Issues, Debates & Future Directions

• Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., Greenhow, C. (2015). The work of educational psychologists in a digitally networked world. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Ed.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (3rd edition). Pp. 29-40. New York: Routledge.
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.

Responses to Kirschner et al:

• Sweller, J., Kirschner, P. A., & Clark, R. E. (2007). Why minimally guided teaching techniques do not work: A reply to commentaries. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 115-121.
• Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction an answer to the right question?. Educational psychologist, 42(2), 109-113.
• Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 91-97.
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
• Spiro, R. J., & DeSchryver, M. (2009). Constructivism: When it’s the wrong idea and when it’s the only idea. In S. Tobias & T. Duffy (Eds.),Constructivist theory applied to instruction: Success or failure. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

• Go to Discussions Page for all questions

• Your questions on this process?
• RCR Training Requirements
  • RCR Training: Authorship

• Final paper & Response to Peers due Monday, April 23.
  Final paper (clean version) submit to —> “Final Critical Integrative Review Paper” D2L Dropbox folder; Response to Peers submit to —> “Response to Peers” Dropbox on D2L. You do not need to submit tracked changes documents.
• Sharing your Critical Integrative Review Paper — Due Monday in class, April 23. (Plan 5 min for presentations)
• Revision of your Article Critique — Due Monday, April 30.
  • Directions for Revising Article Critiques
    When revising, students should make clear how they addressed the raters’ feedback. Students should highlight all revised sections and include a brief note at the beginning of each revised section indicating which feedback point they are addressing and how they addressed it. Your instructor will focus on the highlighted sections and will not be required to read the entire response again (These directions are drawn from EPET Comps directions).