Learning sciences provide a new lens to view learning in the context of cognition, computation, and environment. It emphasizes the importance of constructive and situated views of knowledge, collaboration and practice for the implications. In Sawyer’s (2006) article, deep learning happens when learners build on their prior knowledge and integrate it into the conceptual system (p.4). Situated knowledge highlights the contextual features of learning (p.5). Technology can help to present the dynamic and interactive aspects of knowledge in a learning environment; thus, students may be able to understand its complexity and lessen the static view of a concept. Additionally, the use of machines and computers helps us to investigate implicit learning creating another perspective to understand learning (Bransford et al, 2005). Collaboration can facilitate the thinking and learning process, especially with specific practices and activities.
However, those key aspects will also be the central concerns of the field. The constructive feature will be more useful if teachers provide the proper amount of support to students. But a classroom with diverse student backgrounds, it may be hard to know, track and assess each student’s level of understanding and apply effective scaffolding for each of them. Another concern will be the social interaction and cultural aspect in collaboration. In the community, students may be likely to rely on others' opinions or become compromised and feel constraints to express their real thoughts. Additionally, will there be a concern that collaboration deemphasizes the value of individual thinking?
Hi Minnie,
Thank you for stating your view of the central concerns of the learning sciences and supporting your ideas with specific page numbers from the readings. I agree with you that learning sciences is interested in the processes and outcomes of learning within learning environments. I also agree that many learning scientists emphasize the constructive, situated, and collaborative aspects of learning, and they study these learning phenomena both in schools (FORMAL LEARNING) and out of school (INFORMAL LEARNING) and often mediated by technology.
I look forward to talking more in class on Monday about the following.
Here are just some questions we might discuss, but I look forward to any questions you have or issues that come up in our discussion:
- What ideas about "learning sciences" (LS) seem to overlap with what you know about "educational psychology"?
- What ideas from the LS readings overlap with your own research interests?
- Let's talk more about: "What are its implications for the design and study of learning environments and the role of technology?"
- What learning sciences ideas might seem questionable to educational psychologists and/or difficult to implement?
See you Monday!
Chris
Administrators:
Christine Greenhow
Diana
Rand
cainwil1
Ming
Top Posters:
Phil: 78
Bret: 62
Jessica: 58
Paul: 57
Anna: 56
Shawn: 56
Ying: 53
Eileen: 50
Aric: 42
linqiyan: 12
Newest Members:
Forum Stats:
Groups: 6
Forums: 12
Topics: 13
Posts: 15
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 78
Moderators: 0
Admins: 5
Most Users Ever Online: 14
Currently Online:
1 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)