— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters

Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
SNS and Microblogs... Good for Some Things
RSS
Avatar
29 Posts
(Offline)
1
October 2, 2019 - 5:43 pm

Social networking sites (SNS) and microblogging continue to increase in popularity in both formal and informal educational settings. In this response I take the stand that SNS and Twitter may be used effectively for learning in informal environments and to increase engagement and enthusiasm in courses, it is not suitable for deep learning of complex topics.

Multiple studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of microblogging to improve informal relationships, informal learning, engagement, and enthusiasm within educational courses. For example, Ebner et al., (2010) suggest that microblogging might be effective in fostering informal learning among participants outside of the confines of a course due to the high volume of communication between students on the microblogging platform. Additionally, Elavsky, Mislan, & Elavsky (2011) found Twitter use increased students’ participation and enthusiasm in large-lecture courses. Finally, Robelia, Greenhow & Burton (2011) investigated the impact of the Facebook App “Hot Dish” on participants knowledge of climate change and actions taken to reduce their environmental impact. Use of this App took place outside of formal education settings, and results revealed substantial increases in both knowledge and action related to climate change. Together, these studies demonstrate the potential for SNS to improve learning in informal learning settings (use of the Hot Dish app), and for microblogging to improve engagement and enthusiasm within formal classrooms.

It is possible that some might use Ebner et al., (2010) to suggest that microblogging is a useful way to increase deep and meaningful learning. In fact, when referring to the large amount of communication between participants the researchers state that “It is highly probable that learning took place, and that the process helped students to understand the content of their subject in more depth.” (Ebner et al., 2010, pp. 96). However, the researchers do not analyze these communications for deep and substantive meaning, leading to the inability to draw conclusions around the depth of learning taking place in this space. Further, it is tempting to conclude based on the positive results of multiple studies that SNS and microblogging may enhance learning in ways besides increasing participation, engagement, and enthusiasm. To that, I have two warnings. First, there is currently little empirical work examining how the use of SNS and microblogging are associated with learning and meaningful educational outcomes (Gao, Luo, & Zhang, 2012). Second, in some studies which show positive results the use of SNS and microblogs is heavily skewed towards a small number of participants, with many individuals participating not at all, or in a very limited capacity (Elavsky, Mislan, & Elavsky, 2011), decreasing the researcher’s ability to draw valid conclusions.

Avatar
26 Posts
(Offline)
2
October 4, 2019 - 4:26 pm

“take the stand” 🙂

That “in-depth” quote bugged me as well. I’m sure that links and hot debates within the platform could lead to people seeking outside information for follow-ups but I guess I’m feeling a little bit of the Kozma/Clark article here. Is the microblog merely the proverbial grocery truck delivering the in-depth learning (if it is actually there), a stand-in medium for the transfer of the educational underpinnings?

Avatar
29 Posts
(Offline)
3
October 5, 2019 - 10:02 pm

Hey Matt,

You just had to bring Clark/Kozma back, huh?! That is a very interesting take on the usefulness of SNS and microblogging. Just like the media and learning debate I suppose you could argue both positions. Is it the actual medium of microblogging that leads to positive learning outcomes, or is it the methodological underpinnings of reading other individuals’ posts, commenting, the ability to link and share other resources, etc. which are just packaged in a new grocery truck? It is certainly possible that some other media might offer all the affordances that microblogging does, but it is unclear whether and how this theoretical “other” media might be put into practice.

Avatar
27 Posts
(Offline)
4
October 6, 2019 - 7:00 am

Hi Matthew,

I enjoyed your post and thought you did a good job of using the readings to support your ideas and anticipate other view points. I wonder, related to the Kozma/Clark debate, if the “truth” is somewhere between a new grocery truck and the methodological underpinnings. Technology can amplify our pedagogy, helping us do better or more efficiently what we have always been doing; technology can also disrupt the status quo in education leading to new pedagogies and new forms and theories of learning not possible before. Technology can perturb our models of learning, causing us to re-think them. I am wondering how you see microblogging and/or SNSs as amplifiers, disrupters or both?

I look forward to your thoughts on- or offline.

Chris

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSS Show Stats

Top Posters:

schultz: 47

Aric: 41

ucha: 40

wardsron: 33

schellma: 29

drazinma: 26

Darryl: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 7

Forums: 13

Topics: 25

Posts: 70

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 89

Moderators: 0

Admins: 4

Most Users Ever Online: 51

Currently Online:
2 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)