As Robert Kozma:
Media is not merely a vehicle that transports and delivers information. Continuing to conceptualize media as separate from instructional methods and disregarding the social and cognitive processes by which knowledge is constructed prevents researchers from ever understanding the potential relationship between media and learning. Rather than asking the question, “Do media influence learning?” perhaps, the more appropriate question to pose is “Will media influence learning?.” This reframing is necessary as technological and media innovation will inevitably make its way into classrooms and other social settings. As such, education technologists must seek to establish a relationship between learning and media. To understand the role that media plays in learning, media and instructional methods must not be studied as separate entities; rather, media design and methods must be confounded and integrated with the educational context. Traditional notions of media and instructional design do not attend to the complex, interconnected relationships among medium, method, and situation and are incompatible with constructivist and sociocultural models of learning. Understanding how media, instructional methods, and cognitive processes interact in complex social situations will allow education technologists and researchers to take advantage of the capabilities that media can offer to learning.
As Brittney:
At the time of this debate, Kozma had the foresight to see that media was more than just a delivery mechanism. Kozma pushed researchers to reframe the conversation on media and learning and to forwardly think about the future potentialities and capabilities of the relationships between media, learning, and society. Kozma’s consideration of the importance of the interaction between media, instructional methods, and educational context account for the social process for which cognition is engrained. I found this argument to be compelling as it acknowledges the complex interrelationships that exist between the learner, media, content, and instruction. While each of these elements might not have the same individual impact on learning, they are all working pieces that, together, influence how a learner accesses, acquires, and cultivates content knowledge. Kozma saw the direction that media and learning was taking and urged researchers to reexamine the assumptions foundational in the field.
Brittney,
I think that Kozma really called out the field with this piece. If we are so set on technology becoming a part of educational contexts we should consider how students learn with technology and if the technology is correctly designed to carry out our methods. I totally agree that consideration for the relationship between media and content must be made. I appreciate Kozma’s connection of tech and cognitive and social processes. It seems that in Clark’s argument tech is the antithesis of cognitive processes and we are unable to reconcile them. I appreciate his points, but find Kozma’s argument more able to withstand the time that has elapsed since 1994.
Brittney, I like your reflection on the complex interrelationship between the learner, media, content, and instruction. As Kozma suggest, I think instead of asking the question of “Do media influence learning?”, we should try to think more about “Will media influence learning?”. Actually, I’d like to also step forward and ask the question of “How media influences learning?”, too. Given the time we are living in with all the advancements in media outlets and learning sources, I think that question would makes more sense how media, content and pedagogy (teaching practices) interconnected and support our learning process.
Administrators:
Christine Greenhow
Diana
cainwil1
Ming
Forum Stats:
Groups: 6
Forums: 18
Topics: 40
Posts: 109
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1
Members: 88
Moderators: 0
Admins: 4
Most Users Ever Online: 71
Currently Online:
7 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)