— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters

Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Need for New Ways of Assessment
RSS
Avatar
28 Posts
(Offline)
1
October 21, 2021 - 8:27 pm

It is a reality of today’s world that children are exposed to technological devices even before birth, and the digital world becomes an indispensable part of their lives starting from very young ages. Therefore, it is not logical to the dismiss technological side of students in schools and concentrate only on paper-based literacies as if they do not develop any skills digitally. In my opinion, the cover picture in the New York Times article (Rich, 2008), in which children reading with laptops and parents reading books and newspapers, powerfully catches this reality. As proponents of Web say in the newspaper article, “But this is reading too” (Rich, 2008). However, if schools only focus on text-based literacies, then students who are competent in digital literacies might be seen as inadequate. Therefore, assessments in schools should not only rely on text-based literacy skills. As the New Literacy Studies advocates conventional indicators of literacy lack “life validity” (p. 262) and do not reflect authentic ways of literacy outside of school (Mills, 2010). Because of this, assessment considering digital literacies is an area that needs further research. There are also many areas as you listed in your question (critical media literacies, digital literacies for teachers or for young children, and digital citizenship literacies). However, Mills’s article helped me to think about a new area, assessment, that I have not thought of before.

Avatar
25 Posts
(Offline)
2
October 24, 2021 - 8:59 am

Assessment in the new digital world is such a complex idea, and thank you for bringing this up in your reflection, Betul. What I wonder with regard to assessment is how important or significant the process of proctoring is going to be in situations where assessments are conducted. How do we build technologies that monitors test takers without infringing on their personal privacy, especially when they take tests from their homes. Or do we do away with it completely, and focus more on building trust with the test-takers? Or should the check for plagiarism be tighter to make sure there haven’t been instances of collaborating between test takers amongst themselves?

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSS Show Stats

Top Posters:

schultz: 47

Aric: 41

ucha: 40

wardsron: 33

parkje13: 28

demirayb: 28

gangopa5: 25

isakova2: 19

Darryl: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 6

Forums: 17

Topics: 49

Posts: 124

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 91

Moderators: 0

Admins: 4

Most Users Ever Online: 79

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)