— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters

Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
Growth is the Word
RSS
Avatar
50 Posts
(Offline)
1
April 5, 2018 - 4:55 pm

It would be false to claim that advances in technology will not require changes in the field of educational psychology — I will not make that claim now. But I will suggest that *growth* might be a more apt word than *change*. The word “change” tends to carry with it a perception of replacement. I think there are many foundational ideas in educational psychology that will not go away with the continued advances in technology. Connections to prior knowledge, for example, will still be important (Kirshner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006; Schmidt et al., 2007 — yes, people on both sides of the discovery learning debate agree on this!). But advances in technology will require the field of educational technology to grow. No longer can the measures used in educational psychology be focused on rote skills, and no longer can we rely on tightly-controlled experiments. We need to expand our areas of attention to include the development of messier-to-measure skills, like adaptation to new circumstances (Kuhn, 2007). These are the kinds of skills that technology developments have made most important to teach to children in schools.

Greater integration of media into formal and informal environments will also require growth in educational psychology. In particular, new studies are needed that examine learning that happens in the blended formal and informal spaces made available by social media. The dichotomy between informal and formal learning is shifting (Mishra, Koehler, & Greenhow, 2015), and educational psychology will need to grow to understand the new areas these shifting boundaries are opening up.

Avatar
51 Posts
(Offline)
2
April 5, 2018 - 8:44 pm

Hi Katie, I like your choice of the word “growth” rather than “change.” In my literacy class, we discussed how current literacy research is not about “throwing out” old ideas, but rather building on/improving what has already been done. Unfortunately, this does not seem to translate to the types of standards/assessments and policy changes forced on teachers – a habit that prompts their negativity towards and skepticism of changes to their practice.

I think the formal-informal dichotomy is a symptom of youths’ more efficient adoption of tech compared to pedagogy’s cautious approach. Perhaps doing more to promote an attitude of growth/development (as is done in literacy research) will alleviate some of the resistance teachers project when considering unorthodox approaches to tech in the classroom.

Avatar
50 Posts
(Offline)
3
April 6, 2018 - 1:10 pm

Sarah,
Great points! I think you are right that policy changes tend to manifest as replacement of old ways rather than growth, and that is related to why change is so slow, often highly resisted, and sometimes annoyingly cyclical. I also appreciate your point that youth efficiently adopt tech. Pedagogy’s caution can sometimes translate to inefficiency, and pedagogy’s way of throwing out the old certainly can. In my assistantship, we have been talking about the way that our partner teachers embrace the idea of promoting a growth mindset in their students but seem unaware of their own tendencies toward fixed mindsets.

Forum Timezone: America/Detroit
All RSS Show Stats

Top Posters:

galvins1: 51

richkat3: 50

albertsk: 43

moudgal1: 43

schellma: 41

liraamal: 39

Emilia: 35

zhumengd: 34

Forum Stats:

Groups: 6

Forums: 19

Topics: 97

Posts: 339

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 77

Moderators: 0

Admins: 5

Most Users Ever Online: 58

Currently Online:
1 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)