Different and Complementary | W6 Q2 | Discussion

In his chapter, Sawyer (2006) discuses the learning sciences (LS) as a field that is interested in “reform that is based on studies of professional practice” (p. 4). In other words, LS uses a research lens to understand questions related to understanding and improving learning environments. That said, LS takes an interdisciplinary field approach by merging areas such as science, psychology, and mathematics to learn from different learning environments. Using a constructivist approach to learning and teaching, Sawyer (2006) suggests that LS has contributed to a deep understanding of how knowledge is constructed, and I think this suggests an emphasis on LS being used to advance theory and research.

Barb (2004) suggests that instructional systems are widely understood through design-based research interventions. She states “the focus of design based research may be on developing a profile or theory that characterizes the design in practice (as opposed to simply testing hypotheses).” This indicates a relationship between the type of intervention that is needed and the research that is needed to make it possible.

While there are some clear differences between LS and IS, I think their differences can be used to inform each other. For instance, research used to understand how to improve learning spaces is instrumental for interventions. For example, if a LS researcher is interested in understanding what type of online learning strategies are beneficial for engagement, they may identify a few key things. An interventionist could then focus on enhancing these key strategies while designing an online intervention.