New literacies is an expansive field of study that intersects across disciplines ranging from information technology to critical media studies (Tierney, 2009). I have distilled the types of literacies that I consider to be most relevant for teacher-scholars into the following typologies:
1. “Multimodal/Multimedia literacy”: this type of literacy refers to one’s fluency in being able to design and communicate effectively using multimedia/multimodal elements. As a 21st century teacher, the ability to select the appropriate medium (which platform) to craft the message and to determine appropriate modalities (levels of interactivity/engagement) to display the message is an essential skillset. Multimodal/multimedia literacy encompasses general design principles (Mayer, 2004) for specific media but extends to an ability to fluidly communicate across various media and modalities.
2. “Informational Hypermedia Literacy”: this type of literacy refers to one’s reading and writing abilities for informational purposes in ill-structured, open domains (Spiro, 1990) such as the Internet. This type of literacy, emphasized in school and work-related practices, enables one to effectively navigate, comprehend (Coiro & Dobler, 2007), and synthesize informational media.
3. “New Media Literacy”: this type of literacy refers ability to develop and utilize new media to create tools/objects-to-think-with (LOGO coding program, video cases, hypertext journals, etc.) that extend learning beyond the affordances of traditional media (Spiro, Collins, and Ramchandran, 2007).
I consider these literacies to be most relevant because they capture the range of skillsets that would directly impact one’s ability to construct and disseminate information in a way that embraces the multifaceted avenues of communication enabled by technology.
• Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42 (2), 214-257.
• Tierney, R. J. (2009). Shaping new literacies research: Extrapolations from a review of the Handbook on research on New Literacies. Reading Research Quarterly, 44 (3), 322-339.
• Rich, M. (2008, July 27). Literacy debate: Online R U really reading? The New York Times. Retrieved from http://wwww.nytimes.com
I agree with your identification of new literacies relevant to modern teacher-scholars; however, I am particularly interested in your thoughts on the way you think that the literacies you identified are currently being implemented. There are many instances of educational practice lagging behind research in the application of theories, and new literacies seems to be no different. While these literacies represent worthy goals, Coiro et al. (2009) mentions that there is concern that many new literacies are not being implemented by teachers in an effective way. What do you see as barriers between simply KNOWING about new literacies, and the actual IMPLEMENTATION of these new literacies in actual education settings involving students?
Administrators:
Christine Greenhow
Diana
Rand
cainwil1
Ming
Top Posters:
galvins1: 51
richkat3: 50
albertsk: 43
moudgal1: 43
schellma: 41
liraamal: 39
Emilia: 35
zhumengd: 34
Forum Stats:
Groups: 6
Forums: 19
Topics: 97
Posts: 339
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 77
Moderators: 0
Admins: 5
Most Users Ever Online: 58
Currently Online:
1 Guest(s)