W2 Q2 | Discussion

Bransford et al. argue that 'synergies' across 3 areas of research, which have typically operated independently (i.e., research on implicit learning and the brain; research on informal learning; designs for learning – formal learning and beyond), will "transform" the science of learning and the training of researchers and educators like you? Do you agree? Why or why not? Be sure to use evidence from the readings to support your argument. You may pull in other readings if you like. Please provide in-text citations for outside sources (e.g., Greenhow, 2015) and page numbers from both the readings and outside sources when you quote material.