A leap in the right direction towards change | W2 Q2 | Discussion

I believe that Bransford et al., (2006) main idea was that learning from various sources is valuable to obtaining a holistic learning experience. In their terms, “to create more coherent and useful theories that better illuminate why, how, when, where, and what people learn.” (p. 28). One way in which this type of learning has shown promise is through study aboard programs. This learning space is known for promoting both informal learning through engaging with people in the community, and formal learning through traditional classroom instruction. As Bransford et al. (2006) states that informal learning should be thought of as “observational learning” and formal learning as “language learning” I can see how learning one versus the other may not be as beneficial. Additionally, implicit learning also influences this experience through existing stereotypes of various cultures and people, which (hopefully) would be reshaped as a result of new learning.

The synergistic model of learning has potential to be effective in some spaces (i.e. study abroad), but I’m hesitant to agree that it will “transform the science of learning.” I believe Bransford et al., (2006) could have strengthened their claims by supporting their theory with more substantial evidence of growth and improvement in learning spaces. Nonetheless, educators modeling this approach to learning may be inclined to encourage their students to engage in multiple learning spaces, and even incorporate instances where students have the opportunity to learn from their community and make connections between their lived experiences and their classwork.